Current Location:Home> Cryptocurrency >main body

Binance vs WazirX: Who's Responsible for the $235M Crypto Hack? | Breaking Down the Ownership Dispute

The Which country banned Monero?cryptocurrency community witnessed a heated exchange between Binance and WazirX this week, as the global trading platform publicly disputed claims made by the hacked Indian exchange regarding responsibility for user funds.

Following WazirX's suggestion that resolution of its parent company's legal dispute with Binance might determine liability for the $235 million security breach, Binance released an official statement categorically denying any operational ties to WazirX.

Understanding the Core Disagreement

At the heart of the controversy lies WazirX's recent court filings in Singapore, where parent company Zettai sought legal protection to restructure its financial obligations. The Indian platform indicated this process might impact user access to funds until ownership questions are settled.

Binance's response emphasized that its ongoing legal matters with Zettai bear no connection to WazirX's operational responsibilities. The exchange specifically addressed several statements from WazirX founder Nischal Shetty that it characterized as factually incorrect regarding platform ownership.

Binance's Firm Position

The global exchange made clear it neither owns nor controls WazirX's operations, stating there exists no legal scenario where Binance would assume responsibility for the hacked platform's user balances. This direct refutation comes amid growing user concerns about fund recovery timelines.

Industry observers note this public dispute highlights broader questions about accountability in decentralized finance ecosystems, particularly when platforms experience security failures. Binance's statement urged affected users to continue demanding transparency from WazirX's management team.

Ongoing Fallout from the Security Incident

Since the July breach, WazirX has faced mounting criticism for its handling of the situation. User complaints have focused on communication gaps and controversial decisions like reversing completed trades after the hack was discovered.

The exchange's recent court filings in Singapore represent its latest attempt to navigate the complex aftermath, though Binance maintains these legal proceedings shouldn't impact user fund accessibility. As the situation develops, the cryptocurrency community watches closely for signs of resolution.

This case serves as a reminder of the importance of clear operational structures and accountability mechanisms in digital asset platforms. Both exchanges continue urging users to stay informed through official channels as discussions progress.